RAM BAHADUR AND ANOTHER v. NAIB TEHSILDAR, AYODHYA, TEHSIL SADAR, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/809/2025 · 2025-02-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9994 Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 809 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Bahadur And Another Respondent :- Naib Tehsildar, Ayodhya, Tehsil Sadar, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite party no.1. In view of order being passed notices to opposite party no.2 stand dispensed with.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to decide Mutation Application being Case No.8218 of 2020 (Computerized Case No.T202004230108218) preferred by petitioner expeditiously, which is pending since year 2020.
3. However, from a perusal of order sheet, it appears that the proceeding are pending consideration primarily on account of repeated boycott calls by the Bar Association concerned. It also does not appear from record as to whether all the defendants have put in appearance or not.
4. In view thereof, opposite party no.1 i.e. Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya may consider and decide Case No.8218 of 2020 (Computerized Case No.T202004230108218) (Ram Bahadur and others v. Hira Lal) expeditiously without granting undue adjournments to either parties, in case all the defendants have put in appearance.
5. Benefit of this order shall be available to petitioners only in case they cooperate in early disposal of the proceedings.
6. With aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench