Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P(MD)No.3607 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.3607 of 2025 T.Palanivel
... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Trichy, Trichy District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District. 3.V.Karuppaiah 4.V.Kathirvel
... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.3607 of 2025
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members.
2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is the owner of the property in S.No.193 bearing Door No.53A New Door No.118, subdivided as S.No. 193/1C1 at Peramangalam Village, Musiri Taluk. The third respondent has sold the property to the petitioner through sale deed, dated 09.01.2020 but thereafter, the respondents 3 and 4 causing disturbance to the petitioner for the enjoyment of the property. Therefore, the petitioner sent a representation to the respondents 1 and 2 on 10.02.2025 seeking police protection but the same has not been considered. Hence, the petition.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the official respondents would submit that the petitioner purchased the property from the third respondent but still the third respondent is residing in the said property. Therefore, the matter is purely civil in nature. However, the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.3607 of 2025 representation of the petitioner, dated 10.02.2025 is still under enquiry and the petitioner has not participated for the enquiry. Therefore, they will conduct the enquiry and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.02.2025 within one week.
4. Considering the limited scope of prayer sought for in this petition, this Court without even issuing notice to the private respondents inclined to dispose this petition.
5. Since the representation of the petitioner is under consideration and pending for enquiry, it is for the third respondent to take appropriate decision to dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a week from the date of this
order.
6. With the above said directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands
disposed of. 26.02.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.3607 of 2025 To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Trichy, Trichy District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.3607 of 2025 P.DHANABAL, J.
BTR Crl.O.P(MD)No.3607 of 2025 26.02.2025
5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis