GULSHAN KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1364/2025 · 2025-03-06
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123659 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123659 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13893-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1364 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gulshan Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kishor Singh,Wazhul Qamar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Premkant Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents as well as learned counsel for complainant/opposite party no.4 and perused the material available on record.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 09.11.2024, registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0521 of 2024, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(A), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S. and Section 5(A)/6 of POCSO Act, lodged at Police Station Safdarganj, District Barabanki.
3. The Senior Registrar of this Bench has submitted its report dated 20.02.2025, whereby it is stated that the parties have entered into compromise and settled their dispute amicably.
4. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have settled their dispute amicably. They further agreed to withdraw the cases filed against each other including First Information Report dated 09.11.2024 registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0521 of 2024, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(A), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S. and Section 5(A)/6 of POCSO Act, lodged at Police Station Safdarganj, District Barabanki.
5. Learned counsel for the parties state that the dispute has settled between the parties and there are no further claims or demands against each other with respect to the matter involved in the present writ petition.
6. Considering the terms of settlement, we, accordingly, quash the F.I.R. All proceedings/investigation which may have been held consequent thereto are also quashed and the writ petition is allowed.
7. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this
order to the Court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly.
8. Learned A.G.A. shall communicate this order to the investigating officer concerned. (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench