Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123656 (ALL)

NAGENDRA BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

WRIA/1979/2025 · 2025-02-20

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11094 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1979 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nagendra Bahadur Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Singh Rajawat,Sunder Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri S.S. Rajawat, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable on 19.12.1991 and subsequently he was promoted to the post of Head Constable and was compulsorily retried from the said post on 25.11.2022. 3. it has been submitted that after the petitioner was compulsorily retired, he is entitled for certain benefits including gratuity, bonus and other admissible retirement benefits along with certain arrears of salary. He submits that repeated representations have been given to respondent No. 2 bu no decision on the same has been taken til date accordingly has made a prayer for a suitable direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representations expeditiously. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not oppose the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation for release of arrears of salary, gratuity, bonus along with other admissible retirement benefits to respondent No. 2 within two weeks from today and in case such a representation is moved, respondent No. 2 shall consdier and decide the same within six weeks thereafter in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. 6. In case it is found that petitioner is entitled to the benefits of clam, the same shall be paid to him not later than four weeks form the passing of the aforesaid order. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 20.2.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench