Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12365 (UTT)

SRI SAI TRADING COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA

WPMS/2821/2024 · 2025-02-19

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.2821 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Raunak Pant, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Naresh Pant, Advocate for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2, 3 and 4 would submit that the writ petition has rendered infructuous because earlier the respondents had required the petitioner to file bank guarantee, that order was stayed by this Court. Thereafter, the work was awarded to Riyaz Ahmed and now, no cause is surviving in the writ petition. He would also submit that the second petition of the petitioner is pending. Since, the petitioner is not appearing, the writ petition is dismissed in non- prosecution. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 19.02.2025 Sanjay