RAKESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
CRLP/1475/2025 · 2025-02-18
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123622 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123622 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10546-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1475 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Suphal,Amit Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record.
2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 04.11.2024, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0363 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352, 288, 308(2), 308(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), and Sections 3(1)(da) 3(1)(gh), 3(2)(va) of S.C./S.T. Act, registered at Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned
counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts.
6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench