Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123593 (PNJ)

RAMESH SHARMA v. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER

COCP/4272/2025 · 2025-12-08

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 109 Ramesh Sh Sh. Rajesh South Bloc CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding order dated this Court Sharma (R was dispos ASG who i PPO and officer’s ba submits tha COCP-4272-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.4272 o Date of decision esh Sharma Versus Rajesh Kumar Singh, IAS, Secreta h Block, New Delhi and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Advocate with Mr. M.L. Singhwal, Advo for the respondents/UOI. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petiti eedings be initiated against the respond r dated 14.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) pass Court in CWP-6859-2025 titled as “ ma (Retd.) vs. Union of India and oth disposed of with the observation that ho is present in Court, shall see to and arrears thereto, shall be de ’s bank account at the earliest…..” At the very outset, learned that since the Writ Court order dat 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 4272 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-08.12.2025 …..Petitioner ecretary, Ministry of Defence, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate vocate Senior Panel Counsel l, Advocate petitioner submits that contempt espondents for not complying the ) passed by a Division Bench of as “MR-02275M Major Ramesh nd others”, whereby the petition n that “…..It is expected that the ee to it that the amount as per deposited in the concerned ” arned counsel for the petitioner er dated 14.5.2025 (Annexure P- VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.09 09.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1) has bee rendered in Writ Cou cause survi made by l petition is December Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-4272-2025 (O & M) as been complied with, the present c ered infructuous and the same may be Learned counsel for the respon Court order dated 14.5.2025 has bee e survives in the present petition. In view of the above noted by learned counsel for the petitio ion is disposed of as having been rend Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, mber 08, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 sent contempt petition has been ay be disposed of as such. respondents also submits that the as been complied with; thus, no noted facts and the submissions petitioner, the present contempt rendered infructuous. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.09 09.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document