Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12357 (JHR)

MS IDCOL KALINGA IRON WORKS LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AMARDEEP RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DEPTT OF INDUSTRIES

WPC/1843/2022 · 2025-08-13

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23553 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1843 of 2022 M/s Idcol Kalinga Iron Works Ltd, (A Government of Odisha Undertaking) Represented by its Managing Director Amardeep Ray, aged about 58 years, Son of Late Braja Kishore Ray, Resident of Idcol Kalinga Iron Works Limited, P.O. Matkembeda, P.S. - Barbil, District Keonjhar, State Odisha. ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House Doranda, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 2. M/S Ashoka Foundry & Equipment Pvt. Ltd. II, B-14, Industrial Area, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S B.S. City, District Bokaro. 3. Jharkhand Micro Small and Medium Facilitation Enterprises Facilitation Council, Directorate of Industries, Government of Jharkhand, 3rd Floor, Nepal House Doranda, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No.2, Advocate Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. P.C. Sinha, A.C. to G.A.-III For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate 14/13.08.2025 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has instruction from the client to withdraw the present writ petition as the matter has been settled outside the Court. 2. Learned counsels for the respondents do not have any objection. 3. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty