Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123551 (ALL)

SUBHAM VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/1472/2025 · 2025-02-14

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9863-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1472 of 2025 Petitioner :- Subham Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioner seeks compliance of order passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Appropriate remedy is by way of writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of Writ-C No.10001 of 2024 (Vidya Vati vs. District Magistrate District Amethi and 19 others), wherein we have referred to a decision on the subject rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court where the Revenue Court has been held to be amenable to the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. We are not supposed to be executing authority for such orders. The S.D.M. himself is competent to do so as per law. 4. Let the petitioner approach the S.D.M. concerned, who shall look into the matter, verify the fact and do the needful as per law within one week. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. 6. The Standing Counsel shall communicate our order to the Sub Divisional Magistrate for compliance. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 14.2.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench