2025:UHC:7707-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ALOK KUMAR VERMA 29th AUGUST, 2025 WRIT PETITION NO.284 OF 2023 (M/B) Beena and Another …… Petitioners Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others ……Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Ms. Aananya Jain, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate. Counsel for the State : Mr. B.S. Parihar, Standing Counsel. Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : Ms. Sazia Parveen, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate. Judgment: (Per G. Narendra, C.J.) Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Standing Counsel submits that the writ petition is rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that the tender period was only for six months and that too in the year, 2023, the learned counsel for the petitioner would pray for time. 2. The fact that the tender period is long gone. The question of examining the validity of the tender is rendered academic. In the event, if the petitioner is of 1 2025:UHC:7707-DB the opinion or is advised that the petitioner suffered any loss or damages, it is open for the petitioner to seek remedy before the appropriate forum. 3. The petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous. ____________________ G. NARENDRA, C.J. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt: 29.08.2025 Shiv/JKJ 2