Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010101102019 2025:GAU-AS:229 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2986/2019 SURESH PRASAD S/O LT. DINANATH PRASAD, PERMANENT R/O BORHAPJAN, P.O BORHAPJAN, P.S. DOOMDOOMA, DIST.-TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786125 VERSUS THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN-781001 2:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TINSUKIA ELECTRICAL CIRCLE APDCL TINSUKIA ASSAM-786125 3:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER TINSUKIA ELECTRICAL DIVISION APDCL TINSUKIA ASSAM-786125 4:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER TINSUKIA ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION-II ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (UAZ) DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM-786125 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA DIST.-TINSUKIA ASSAM-78612 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MR. R S MISHRA Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 08.01.2025 Heard Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that as the electrical connection has been provided to the petitioner by the APDCL, the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. W. Ahmed, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the APDCL. In view of the fact that the electrical connection has been restored to the petitioner’s premises, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant