Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Tripura · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1235 (TRI)

Sri Lal Bahadur Magar Pachbhaiya v. Sri Pankaj Chopra

Cont.App.(C)/3/2024 · 2025-01-20

S Datta Purkayastha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Cont.App.(C) No.03/2024 I.A. No.01/2024 in Cont.App.(C) No.03/2024 Sri Lal Bahadur Magar Pachbhaiya, S/O. Late Hira Bahadur Magar Pachbhaiya, presently residing at C/O. Deepa Magar, Quarters A/1A, MeECL Compound, Lumjhinghai, Shillong, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, Pin-793001. ……… Appellant(s). V E R S U S Sri Pankaj Chopra, presently holding the post of Assistant General Manager, The State Bank of India, Centralized Pension Processing Centre, 2nd Floor, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006. ………Respondent(s). For Appellant(s) : Mr. B.N. Majumder, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Rajib Saha, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : None. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. PURKAYASTHA Order 20/01/2025 Mr. B.N. Majumder, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Rajib Saha, learned counsel for the appellant, at the outset submits that no punishment has been imposed by the learned contempt Court in terms of Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. As such, the instant appeal under Section 19 of the Act of 1971 would not be maintainable. He seeks permission to withdraw the same. In that view of the matter, the instant contempt appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. The condonation application [I.A. No.01 of 2024] also stands disposed of. (S.D. PURKAYASTHA), J (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ Pulak PULAK BANIK Digitally signed by PULAK BANIK Date: 2025.01.21 16:31:01 +05'30'