Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123480 (ALL)

RANA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECTT. ADM. DEPTT. LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/1923/2025 · 2025-02-17

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9986 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1923 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rana Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thr u. Prin. Secy. Sectt. Adm. Deptt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anurag Srivastava Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri R.P. Singh, the petitioner who is appearing in person as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that previously he was working in the Secretariat Department as Upper Division Assistant which was subsequently renamed as Review Officer and subsequently he joined on the post of Assistant Prosecuting Officer on 02.02.1987. He submits that during the period he was working as UDA, the amount of G.P.F. has not been paid to him and consequent several representations were made to the respondents and lastly by means of order dated 28.05.2015 the Office of Accountant General, Uttar Pradesh has informed that an amount of Rs. 7173/- was deposited in the said account. 3. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 19.06.2014 to the respondent which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 19.06.2014 (Annexure No. 9) in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 19.06.2014 (Annexure No. 9) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 17.2.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench