Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9622 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1418 of 2025 Applicant :- R.P. Singh @ Arpit Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Haridwar Singh (H.D.Singh ),Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "The petitioner named above most respectfully begs to submit that for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Charge-Sheet No. 01/2024, dated 06.07.2024, under sections 323, 354, 504, 506 I.P.C., Section 3(1) (Dha), 3(1) (Dha) & 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act and Section 7/8 Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Bakshi Ka Talaab, District Lucknow, as well as Summoning Orders Dated 27.09.2024 respectively, passed by Learned Additional District Judge / POCSO Main, Lucknow, in Session Trial No. 2310/2024, 'State Vs R. P. Singh', arising out of Case Crime No.0131/2024, under sections - 323, 354, 504, 506 I.P.C., Section 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha) & 3(2) (Va) SC/ST Act and Section 7/8 Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow, whereby the petitioners have been summoned under sections - 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Section 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha) & 3(2) (Va) SC/ST Act and Section 9/10 Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant(s) has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant(s) to file bail application before the trial court, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant(s) applies/apply for bail before the Court concerned, his/their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Liberty is also granted to the applicant(s) to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant(s) applies/apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench