TAUSEEF KHAN @ RUMI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
CRLR/194/2025 · 2025-02-14
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9619 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 194 of 2025 Revisionist :- Tauseef Khan @ Rumi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Gulam Ali Rashidi,Ram Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent No.2 is dispensed with. This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 22.01.2025 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Room No.5, Lucknow in Criminal Case No.1354/2018 whereby the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by respondent No.2 is allowed. The relevant part of the order is extracted below:-
"20-
आववददकक कक पकररनकपत अअतररत धकरक-125 ससआर.पस.सस. आअदशक
रप सव सवसककर दकयक जकतक हह। दवपकस कक आदवदशत दकयक जकतक हह दक वह
आववददकक कक पकररनकपत दकखखल करनव कव ददनकअक सव आदवश कक दतखर तक
मम० 5000/- र.
पदतमकह व आदवश कक दतखर सव मम० 7000/- र. पदतमकह,
पतयवक मकह कव दस तकरसख तक अदक करव तरक अअतररम भरण पकषण कव रप
मम दस रयस धनरकदश उक मम समकयकखजत कक जकयवरस। 21-
दवपकस दकरक उपरकक धनरकदश अदक नहह करनव पर आववददकक नयकयकलय
मम पकररनकपत दकखखल कर उक धनरकदश पकप करनव कक अखधककररणस हकरस।
उसकव पशचकतत यदद दवपकस दकरक धनरकदश कक अदकयरस न दकयव जकनव पर
दवपकस कक पतयवक चचक कव खलए एक मकस कव ककरकवकस सव दणणणत दकयक जक
सकतक हह तरक भरण पकषण कक धनरकदश अररदणण कक भकभदत वसचल कक जक
सकतस हह।" It is not disputed that revisionist is husband of the respondent No.2. Revisionist has neglected his wife. The respondent No.2 is destitute and is incapable of maintaining herself whereas revisionist as per his own case is earning Rs.35,000/- per month and is running national tent house thus, considering these facts, the impugned order appears to have been passed, there appears to be no illegality in the order impugned. The revision being
devoid of merits is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench