1 2025:CGHC:12350 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 2017 of 2025 Nandlal Rathore S/o Jageswar Prasad Aged About 54 Years R/o Singhannsara, Ps Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer Of Police Station Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh (As Per Charge Sheet) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Monika Thakur, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 12.03.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.34/2025, registered at Police Station Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh (C.G.) for the offences punishable under Sections 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.03.12 16:56:29 +0530 2 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, it is alleged on the applicant that Police of police Station Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh recovered 6 bulk litre of Mahua liquor from the illegal possession of the applicant and registered the case against him. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 29.01.2025, though the charge-sheet has been filed, but the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. He later submits that so far as criminal antecedents of the applicant is concerned, though as per record applicant has 32 previous criminal antecedents, but all of them have already been disposed of. He lastly submits that under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years, therefore, he prays grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application of the applicant, but could not dispute the fact that all the 32 previous criminal antecedents of the applicant have already been disposed of. 5. I have learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant, quantity of liquor seized and the fact that all the pervious criminal antecedents have already been disposed of, charge-sheet has already been filed and he is in jail since 29.01.2025 and conclusion 3 of the trial is likely to take some time hence, I am inclined to allow this application. 7. Let applicant, Nandlal Rathore, involved in Crime No.34/2025, registered at Police Station Sakti, District- Sakti (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 84 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, 4 under Section Section 209 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. OfÏce is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Manpreet