Pradeep C v. The Inspector General of Registration
WP(MD)/5689/2024 · 2025-07-10
A D Maria Clete, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123435 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123435 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(MD) No.5689 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE W.P.(MD) No.5689 of 2024 C.Pradeep
... Petitioner -vs- 1.Inspector General of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road Chennai 2.The District Registrar Madurai South, Madurai 3.The Sub-Registrar Chellampatti Madurai 4.Moosa Mubarak Ali 5.Panchavarnam ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue ____________ p. 2 W.P.(MD) No.5689 of 2024 a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to initiate inquiry against respondents 3 to 5 with regard to the registration of unapproved and un- regularized plots after the cut-off date i.e. 20.10.2016 in S.Nos.3/1A2A2 and 3/22 Nattamangalam Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilakkumar Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.A.Robinson for R4 & R5 O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] With regard to the complaint given by the petitioner regarding action to be initiated against the illegalities committed by the respondents 4 & 5, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, on instructions, submitted that already the employee concerned has been placed under suspension and disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against him.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4 & 5 would submit that the respondents 4 & 5 are ready and willing to cancel the ____________ p. 3 W.P.(MD) No.5689 of 2024 objectionable sale deeds.
3. It is for the respondents 3 to 5 to do all the necessary things to set right the illegalities and it is for the authority concerned to consider the allegations independently based on its own merits and in accordance with the disciplinary rules.
4. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
[S.M.S., J.] [A.D.M.C., J.]
10.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
krk To: 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai. 2.The District Registrar, Madurai South, Madurai. 3.The Sub-Registrar, ____________ p. 4 W.P.(MD) No.5689 of 2024 Chellampatti, Madurai. ____________ p. 5 W.P.(MD) No.5689 of 2024 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE
, J.
krk W.P.(MD) No.5689 of 2024 10.07.2025 ____________