Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123422 (ALL)

RAGHVENDRA SINGH PNO 112510611 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/1822/2025 · 2025-02-13

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9285 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1822 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raghvendra Singh Pno 112510611 Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Charitra Pandey,Shashank Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Shashank Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was working on the post of Constable in Civil Police when first information report being Case Crime No. 1053 of 2021, under Sections 376, 506, 504 IPC, was lodged at Police Station - Civil Lines, District - Moradabad and during pendency of the criminal proceedings the petitioner became eligible for being promoted to the post of Head Constable and due to the pendency of criminal proceedings petitioner's case was duly considered and kept in sealed cover. 3. it has been next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequently trial has been concluded and by means of judgment and order dated 11.03.2024, passed by the Additional District Judge/FTC-3, Moradabad, the petitioner has been acquitted. 4. It has been further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after after acquittal of petitioner from the aforesaid criminal case, there is no further impediment for consideration of his candidature for promotion to the post of Head Constable. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter up to some length has submitted that grievance of petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent no. 3 - Deputy Inspector General of Police (Establishment), U.P., Lucknow is directed to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2025, annexed as Annexure - 8 to the writ petition, given by petitioner in this regard, expeditiously. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case respondent no. 3 is directed to consider and decide petitioner's representation. 7. In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 3 - Deputy Inspector General of Police (Establishment), U.P., Lucknow to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2025, annexed as Annexure - 8 to the writ petition, given by petitioner in this regard, expeditiously, say within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him, by means of reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench