Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12341 (JHR)

RAVI RANJAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3300/2025 · 2025-06-19

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:16069 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3300 of 2025 ----- 1.Ravi Ranjan Kumar, S/o Satish Chandra Verma, R/o Village- Kushwaha Nagar, P.O.- Nagar Thana Nagar, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad, Bihar 2.Raju Ranjan Kumar, S/o Birendra Singh, R/o- Beltola, P.O.+P.S.- Imamganj, District- Aurangabad, Bihar .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhav Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, AddI. P.P. …...... 04/ 19.06.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail under Sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 apprehending their arrest for the offences under Section 379 of IPC in connection with Saraidhela P.S. Case No.321 of 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Dhanbad. 3. The maximum punishment of the aforesaid section is 7 years or less. It has been stated that the petitioners complied with the notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS. 4. Since the petitioners have complied with the notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS, they should appear before the Court concerned as this case is covered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773. 5. The Court concerned, who will pass order as per the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./