Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:11813 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 7093 of 2025 Decided on : 01.05.2025 Rupna Devi and another. …Petitioners Versus Union of India and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No.1, 3 & 4. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 & 5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, learned Senior Panel Counsel and Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 3 & 4 and respondents No.2 & 5, respectively.
2. When the case was taken up for consideration,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that presently interest of justice would be served in case, this petition is 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:11813
disposed of by issuing a direction to respondent No.2 to take a call on the representation submitted by them, copy whereof is appended with the petition as Annexure P-4.
3. In the light of the said prayer made by learned counsel, this petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, is disposed of with the direction that let representation Annexure P-4 of the petitioners, be decided by respondent No.2, within a period of four weeks from today, after adhering to the principles of natural justice. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
May 01, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)