Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123375 (MAD)

Alagarsamy v. The District Collector / Monitoring Committee

WP(MD)/4813/2025 · 2025-02-21

J Nisha Banu, S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.4813 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.02.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.4813 of 2025 Alagarsamy ...Petitioner -Vs- 1.The District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 4.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. 5.The Village Administrative Officer, Pachamalaiyankottai Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. 6.Muniammal 7.Vijayabalamurugan 8.Prakash 9.Thamaraiselvi ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.4813 of 2025 PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 10.10.2024 sent by the petitioner for the purpose of cancelling the patta obtained by the respondents 6 to 9 in S.No.180/2, situate at Pachamalaiyankottai Village, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District, which classified as Anatheenam in the revenue records. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For R1 to R5 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) Heard Mr.A.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 5. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this petition, notice to the respondents 6 to 9 is dispensed with. 2.By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.4813 of 2025 3.The contention of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking to cancel the forged patta obtained by the private respondents, which is classified as Anantheenam land in the revenue records, has not been considered so far. Hence, this writ petition is filed. 4.Considering facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.10.2024 after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. (J.N.B.,J.) (S.S.Y.,J.) 21.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.4813 of 2025 To 1.The District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 4.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. 5.The Village Administrative Officer, Pachamalaiyankottai Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.4813 of 2025 J. NISHA BANU,J. and S.SRIMATHY.J ta W.P.(MD)No.4813 of 2025 21.02.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis