Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12337 (AP)

K. Lakshmamma @ Lakshmi Devi v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6334/2019 · 2025-08-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010145362019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6334/2019 Between: 1. K. LAKSHMAMMA @ LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O. LATE K.LINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MANDIGIRI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. K.LOKESH, S/O. LATE. K.LINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MANDIGIRI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. K.TIPPANNA, S/O. LATE. K.LINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MANDIGIRI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. K.SANNAIAH, S/O.LATE. K.LINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MANDIGIRI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. K.NARASAPPA, S/O. LATE. K.LINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MANDIGIRI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADONI III TOWN POLICE STATION, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, ADONI MANDAL, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. B SANJ IRMA, S/O. B.PEDDA NALLANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURIST R/O. MANDIGIRI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6334 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners’' Land admeasuring Acers 1.30 cts in S. No. 553 of Mandigiri Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. in directing the petitioner to attend the police station everyday and harassing them in a civil dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent herein with regard to the property admeasuring Ac.1.30 cts in S.No.Ei53 situated at Mandigiri Ulage, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District as bad, illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 19 86 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute between petitioner and 6th respondent and grant such other relief or relief's and to pass…” 2. Sri V.S.K Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners appeared through video conference. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the preliminary enquiry of the police would reveal that the impugned dispute is a civil dispute, and therefore, police will not interfere in this matter. 4. The submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home are placed on record. 5. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court is of the considered opinion that the matter can be closed without going into the merits of the case. 4 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.08.2025 Pmk 5 08 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6334 OF 2019 Date: 04.08.2025 Pmk