Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123349 (ALL)

AZAD MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHER v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR RANA PRATAP MARG LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/1862/2025 · 2025-02-14

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9597 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1862 of 2025 Petitioner :- Azad Mohammad And Another Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director Rana Pratap Marg Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Savita Jain,Shashi Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and Shri Krishna Vishwakarma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the competent authority for release of post retiral benefits along with interest thereof in view of the fact that petitioners have superannuated from service on 30.06.2024 and 31.07.2024 respectively and no dues certificate has also been issued to them. 3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to move fresh individual representations before respondent No. 3 i.e. The Chief Accounts Officer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such representations are filed, the same shall be decided within period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioners are found entitled for the aforesaid reliefs, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench