2025:UHC:9297 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1678/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Ms. Azmeen Wason, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs: “(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to calculate the period of services rendered by the petitioners in Basic Shiksha Parishad in the erstwhile State of Uttar Pradesh and to grant all consequential benefits thereof including promotion. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the representations of the petitioners. (III) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in view of order dated 07.10.2016 passed by this Hon’ble Court. (IV) Issue a writ or order in the nature of certiorari quashing the undated order of June 2025 by which the case of the petitioners was rejected.” 3. Learned State Counsel, however, has drawn attention of this Court to a communication, issued by Regional Additional Director, Elementary, Kumaon to the District Education Officer, which is on record as Annexure-5 to the writ petition. 2025:UHC:9297 4. Perusal of said communication reveals that petitioner had earlier filed Writ Petition No. 1423 of 2024 (SS), which was disposed of with direction to competent authority to take decision on petitioner’s representation, by speaking and reasoned order. 5. By the document enclosed as Annexure-5 to the writ petition, Additional Director has called comments from District Education Officer, Elementary. Thus, learned State Counsel is right in submitting that matter is still pending consideration before competent authority and writ petition is premature. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed, as premature with liberty to petitioner to approach this Court as and when cause of action arises. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.10.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f0 31a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC462 6D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.10.16 17:52:46 +05'30'