[2025:RJ-JP:27111] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5790/2023 Shahjad Pahalwan S/o Late Shri Asnad Shah, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Majar Phool Baba, Chini Ki Burj, Chowkri Sarhad, Near Chaugan Stadium, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Jaipur Municipal Corporation, Jaipur Heritage, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner, Jaipur Municipal Corporation, Hawamahal Zone (West), Jaipur. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Jaipur Municipal Corporation, Hawamahal Zone (West), Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Lokesh Kumar Sharma with Ms.Anjum Parveen JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow the writ petition and A. By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to consider and allow the petitioner's application filed and for allotment/ regularization and for issuance of the lease deed of the land in dispute i.e. the land measuring 24.40 mtrs. x 7.50 mtrs. situated [2025:RJ-JP:27111] (2 of 3) [CW-5790/2023] near Chaugan Stadium i.e. at the east side of the place being known as Phool Shah Baba Ki Majar and they may be directed to consider the application as per the policy and order dated 01.07.2022. B. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favor of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents to decide the application submitted by the petitioner seeking regularization/ allotment. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application submitted by the petitioner with the aforesaid prayer is lying pending before the Authorities concerned since 2022 and in spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the said application has not been decided by the respondents by passing a reasoned and speaking order, therefore, appropriate direction be issued to the Authorities concerned to decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously as early as possible within the time frame. 4. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the respondents to decide the application (pending if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. 5. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/ direction to the respondents to decide [2025:RJ-JP:27111] (3 of 3) [CW-5790/2023] the application of the petitioner, pending if any, in a particular way. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /45