Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123309 (ALL)

JITENDRA BAHADUR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT.LKO AND 14 OTHERS

WRIC/1383/2025 · 2025-02-10

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8516-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1383 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jitendra Bahadur And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt.Lko And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Singh,Shailendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Against the order passed under Section 67 (1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which as calimed by the petitioner was an ex-parte order, application for restoration has been filed by the petitioner which is fixed for 18.2025. 3. Counsel for the petitioner says that 2/3rd of the house/structure has already been demolished and now the remaining house/structure is to be demolished based on the impugned notice. 4. Let the recall application of the petitioner be decided by the end of this month and thereafter if the order passed under Section 67 (1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 still remains operative, further action be taken, but not otherwise. 5. The petition is disposed of. 6. Mr. Manish Mishra, learned standing counsel to communicate our order to the Tehsildar concerned. 7. Copy of this order be provided to the parties on payment of usual charges within 24 hours. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 10.2.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench