Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1233 (UTT)

JASPREET KAUR AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/34/2025 · 2025-06-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.34 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sachin Veer Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal and Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, B.H.s’ for the State. 3. State counsel, on instructions, submits that after investigation name of petitioner no.1 – Jaspreet Kaur has been dropped while a charge sheet has been submitted against petitioner no.2 – Lakhvinder Singh @ Lucky on 02.04.2025. 4. In this view of the matter counsel for the petitioners submits that he would advise petitioner no.2 to challenge the charge sheet in appropriate proceedings before appropriate forum. 5. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the charge sheeted petitioner no.2 to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum in appropriate proceedings. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.06.2025 SK