PUSHPA DEVI v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER, DEVI PATAN MANDAL, GONDA AND OTHERS
A227/739/2025 · 2025-02-13
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123283 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123283 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9281 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 739 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pushpa Devi Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nagendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 9 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing counsel. Sri Pankaj Gupta learned counsel has received notices on behalf of respondent no.7. The petitioner has approached this Court with the limited prayer that his application for interim relief filed in an Appeal no.1382 of 2024; Computerized Case No.C202408000001382 is engaging attention of the respondent no.1. Despite several dates have been fixed but the same has not been heard and decided. The private respondents are raising constructions over the property in dispute. Having heard the aforesaid submissions and from a perusal of the material on record including the extracts of the order sheet which have been brought on record as Annexure no.5, it appears that the matter is listed for admission as well as for application for interim relief on 19.02.2025. The record also indicates that the private respondents are already present before the respondent no.1. Accordingly, at this stage, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition on merit, however, leaving it open for the petitioner to press the application before the court concerned on the next date fixed. It is expected that the application for interim relief as well as maintainability shall be considered and decided by the court concerned on the next date fixed and if the same is not possible then within three weeks, thereafter. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.. With the aforesaid the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 13.2.2025/Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench