Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12328 (GAU)

SAIDUL ISLAM ALIAS CHAIDUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1092/2025 · 2025-06-08

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010101592025 2025:GAU-AS:7526 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1092/2025 SAIDUL ISLAM ALIAS CHAIDUL ISLAM SO ABDUL RASHID VILL-PACHNOI NONKE, P.S. ORANG, DIST. UDALGURI (BTR), ASSAM PH. NO. 9859043615 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ALI, MR M HOQUE,MR. Y ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 09.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. A. Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State Page No.# 2/2 of Assam who has produced the report furnished by the Officer-In-Charge of Orang Police Station inter alia stating that only 1(one) case has been registered against the petitioner in Orang Police Station, i.e. Orang P.S. Case No. 91/2022 and no other case has been pending in the said police station against the present petitioner. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in Orang P.S. Case No. 91/2022, the petitioner is already on bail. He does not have apprehension of getting arrested by the police of Orang Police Station. 2. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the police of Orang Police Station is visiting the petitioners house in night without any authority, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court seeking appropriate relief by filing appropriate application. 3. This anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. 4. Let the report of the Officer-In-Charge of Orang Police Station be kept in the case record as part of the record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant