NAJAR ALI @ NAJIR ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A482/1432/2025 · 2025-02-14
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9673 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1432 of 2025 Applicant :- Najar Ali @ Najir Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rama Kant Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. Notices to respondent no. 2 to 4 are dispensed with in view of the proposed order. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned summoning order dated 18/01/2025 arising out of complaint case Oath Commissioner no. 142/2024, under section 354(a) I.P.C and 7/8 POCSO Act 2012 Police station Rupaidiha, District Bahraich passed by Court of Additional Session Judge / Special Judge (POCSO Act), Bahraich, as contained in Annexure no. 1 to this petition. Perused the record. A perusal of the record so also the statement of the minor girl aged about 11 years shows that the allegations against the accused are serious in nature and coupled with the statements of PW-2 as well as statement of the complainant, prima facie commission of cognizable offence is made. There appears to be no illegality in the impugned order. The petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench