SUBHASH CHANDRA HEMBRAM ALIAS SUBHAS HEMBRAM ALIAS SUBHAS CH. HEMBRAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./1111/2025 · 2025-05-09
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12322 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12322 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:14021
Cr.M.P. No. 1111 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 1111 of 2025
----
1. Subhash Chandra Hembram @ Subhas Hemram @ Subhas Ch. Hembram, aged about 41 years, s/o Ramchandra Hembram, resident of Ankaduar, Puruliya, PO and PS – Dumru, West Bengal
2. Rohini @ Sumli Hembram, aged about 38 years, w/o – Subhash Chandra Hembram, resident of Ankaduar, Puruliya, PO and PS – Dumru, West Bengal
3. Samir Tudu, aged about 19 years, S/o Mangal Manjhi, resident of Bandhgora, PO and PS – Satanpur, Bokaro
4. Neha Kumari, aged about 27 years, D/o – Mangal Manjhi, resident of Bandhgora, PO and PS – Satanpur, Bokaro
5. Mina Kumari @ Meena Kumari, aged about 29 years, D/o Lakhu Manjhi, resident of Bandhgora, PO and PS – Satanpur, Bokaro
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Md. Nasim Akhtar, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, APP
------- 02/09.05.2025 This petition has been filed for modification of the
order dated 09.04.2024 passed in A.B.A. No.1099 of 2024.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that within the stipulated time the petitioners have not been able to surrender before the learned Court as the bailors have not been arranged. He submits that now the bailors have been arranged and the other family members are ready to execute the bail bond.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the privilege
2025:JHHC:14021
Cr.M.P. No. 1111 of 2025 of anticipatory bail was already provided to the petitioners in spite of that they have not surrendered.
4. In view of the above and considering that the privilege of anticipatory bail has already been provided to the petitioners, however, the petitioners have not been able to surrender before the learned Court due to the reason pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, as such further two weeks’ time from today is extended to surrender before the learned Court.
5. The order dated 09.04.2024 passed in A.B.A. No.1099 of 2024 is modified to the above extent.
6. This petition is disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Sangam/