Devandla Thirupathaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/9177/2022 · 2025-09-14
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12322 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12322 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010144762022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0E0 0 crtn MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9177 OF 2022 Between: Devandia Thirupathaiah, S/o. Giddaiah, aged 59 years, Occ. AgrI R/o. H No. 3-215, V.R. Nagar VTC, Chandrasekarapuram Village and Mandal Prakasam District ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its PrI. Secretary Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
2. The District Collector/Land Acquisition Officer Ongole
3. The Sub Collector, Sub Collector's Office, Kandukuru Town, Prakasam District
4. The Tahsildar, Chandrasekharapuram Mandal, Prakasam District
5. The Superintendent Engineer, National Highway Authority Vijayawada. 6. The Executive Engineer, National Highway Authority of India, Ongole, Prakasam District
7. Smt. Mannepalli Venkata Lakshmamma, W/o. Nageswara Rao major R/o. Kavilampadu Village, CS Puram Mandal Prakasam District Revenue Prakasam District, of India, , aged ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents no. 2 to 5 in not paying the compensation amount to the petitioner basing on the acquisition of the petitioner land to an extent of Ac.1.84 cents in Sy No. 91/2 of Kovilampadu Village, CS Puram Mandal, Prakasam District by the 5th respondent for formation of New National Highway from Mydukur to Singarayakonda and trying to pay the compensation to the 6th respondent whose name illegally entered into the compensation list who is not having any right, title over my property without considering the lawyer notice dated 21.12.2020 and representation 14.3.2022 of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the compensation amount to the petitioner by including the petitioner name in the land acquisition list in respect of land in Sy No.91/2 to an extent of Ac.1.84 cents of Kovilampadu Village in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the compensation amount to the petitioner by acquiring the petitioner land in Sy No. 91/2 to an extent of Ac.1.84 cents of Kovilampadu Village by deleting the name of the 7th respondent from the acquisition list by considering the lawyer notice dated 21.12.2020 and representation 14.3.2022 of the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4:GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6: SRI S.S.VARMA, SC FOR NHAI Counsel for the Respondents; SRI K. V. VIJAYA KUMAR The Court made the following order; ■/T 1 I
APHC010144762022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SgH [3233] r MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9177/2022 Between:
1.DEVANDLA THIRUPATHAIAH, S/0. GIDDAIAH, AGED 59 YEARS R/0. H NO. 3-215, V.R. NAGAR VTC, OCC. AGRL CHANDRASEKARAPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR / LAND ACOUISITION OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE 3.THE SUB COLLECTOR, SUB COLLECTOR'S OFFICE, KANDUKURU TOWN PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4.THE TAHSILDAR, CHANDRASEKHARAPURAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 5.THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY, AUTHORITY OF INDIA, VIJAYWADA. 6.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 7.SMT MANNEPALLI VENKATA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED MAJOR R/O. KAVILAMPADU VILLAGE, CS PURAM
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.9177of2022 MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.KVVIJAYA KUMAR 2.GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.9177of2022 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, for which, he addressed a letter dated 11.08.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial). 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order If any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1.
One CC to M/s. Kavitha Gottipati, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri K. V. Vijaya Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri S.S.Varma, SC for NHAI[OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies. 2. 3. 4. 5. ssb
HIGH COURT DATED:15/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 9177 OF 2022 oo I 2 ♦ SEP 20?‘ & m Seciion ^ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS