CHAUDHARY ANWAR HABEEB v. DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL DISTRICT LUCKNOW THRU. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER
WRIC/1373/2025 · 2025-02-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123192 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123192 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8767 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1373 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chaudhary Anwar Habeeb Respondent :- Debts Recovery Tribunal District Lucknow Thru. Prescribed Authority And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pooja Yadav,Rohit Kumar,Shiv Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Anurag Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Alok Saxena, learned counsel for respondent no.2 - Bank.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking quashment of the
order dated 03.02.2025 passed by the DRT. The other relief claimed is that the said order maybe modified and the time for deposit may be extended.
3. Perusal of the order impugned reveals that the Tribunal had
directed to deposit 50% of the amount on or before 06.02.2025 and for the balance, the benefit of two installments was extended. The matter is said to be listed on 26.03.2025 for hearing and disposal of the case.
4. Considering the fact that the petitioner requires modification of the order passed by the DRT, present petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file an appropriate application seeking modification of the order before the DRT within three days from today.
5. If any application is filed within three days from today, the same shall be considered by the DRT within a period of another ten days.
6. For a period of ten days, the eviction shall remain stayed.
7. It is further provided that in case the petitioner approaches the respondent - bank for OTS, the same shall also be considered in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 11.2.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench