Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010143862025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7406/2025 Between:
1. ARIGELA SURESH, S/O. A. CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO.33-16, GODAVARI SUPER MARKET,
JYOTHI CONVENT, TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. VAKALAPUDI RAMA KRISHNA,, S/O. RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO.2-36, TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SIRISHA MIRIYALA,, W/O. MURTHY MIRIYALA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. LIG-612, BHARATH NAGAR COLONY WATER TANK BHARATH NAGAR, BALA NAGAR, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE - 500018.M
4. CHOLLA PRASAD,, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO.5-15, YSR STREET, AZZARAM ROAD, TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. ANDROTHU SRINIVAS,, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC AGRICUITURIST, R/O. H.NO.1-44/1, TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. KODURI HAH KUMAR,, S/O. VENKATA SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST AND BUSINESS R/O. H.NO.2-211, TADIPARRU VILLAGE,
UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODIIVARI DISTRICT. 2
7. KILANI GANGAMMA,, W/O. KILANI APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. H.NO.7-6-5, WARD NO. 10, THOTA VARI VEEDHI, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, NELAPADU VILLAGE, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOVVURU DIVISION, KOVVURU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, UNDRAJAVARAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. THE TADIPARRU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SETIRETARY, TADIPARRU VILLAGE,
UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. GADIMELLA KONDALA RAO, S/O. TATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. H.NO.2-50, KAMMA RAMALAYAM STREET, TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. OLISETTY LAKSHMI NARAYANA, S/O. LACHANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 2-35, NEAR VIMANAM BUILDING STREET,
TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. ANDROTHU RAMESH, S/O. BULLA ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 1-45, NEAR KANAKA DURGAMMA TEMPLE, TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
3
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. C PRAKASH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2.
GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri C. Prakash Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue; Ms. C. Sowya, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for ZPPs, MPPs and Gram Panchayat and Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development. 2. The Panchayat Secretary, Tadiparru, Undrajavaram Mandal, East Godavari District (Respondent No.6) has furnished the Written Instructions dated 19.03.2025; the Revenue Divisional Officer (Respondent No.4) has furnished the Written Instruction dated 24.03.2025 and the District Gram Panchayat Officer, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District (Respondent No.3) has also submitted the Written Instructions dated 06.04.2025. Copies of all the Written Instructions have been supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners. The same are taken on record. 3. The above Written Instructions of all the Official Respondents unanimously state that the Panchayat Land has never been alienated in favour of anyone for any communal purpose, much less for construction of Temple. 4. Having taken note of all the Written Instructions, as mentioned above, this Court is of the opinion that, no further consideration in this Writ Petition is necessary in view of the Written Instructions that the Gram Panchayat Land has not been alienated in favour of anyone for construction of Temple. 4
5.With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 6.Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 21.04.2025 JKS
5
67
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No. 7406 OF 2025
21.04.2025
JKS