Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123113 (ALL)

SATYA PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/1422/2025 · 2025-02-17

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10016-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1422 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar,Vijay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravi Shanker Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Sri Alok Kumar Pandey, Advocate has filed his power on behalf of the opposite party No.4 today in the Court, which is taken on record. Heard. The petitioner alleges construction of a khadanja on his sahan land part of abadi. The petitioner's counsel relies upon a khasra, copy of which is annexed as annexure No.1 to the Writ Petition. It is not possible under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to consider as to whether the sahan is of the petitioner and if so, what is the extent of the sahan land of the petitioner. These are matters, seen purely before the civil court or if otherwise permissible under any provision of law before the concerned authority but we cannot go into such question. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedy as per law. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench