1 APHC010145082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 7434/2025 Between: K Kumari ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GANDAVALLI MAHESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following order: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 7434 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in proposing to demolish the house structures of the petitioner in an extent of 96.61 sq. yards in Sy.No.162 of Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati District, house bearing assessment No.1012073125, Door No.22-9-19/E, Padmavathi Nagar, Tirupati, pursuant to possessory agreement of sale, without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the vendor of the petitioner one Mr.J. Narayana was said to have allotted house site patta by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupati. Thereafter, the petitioner is said to have entered into agreement of sale on 27.03.2012 and since then, she is in possession of the said property. While so, without issuing any notice to the petitioner, Respondent- Corporation is attempting to demolish. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent-Corporation, on instructions, submits that the petitioner had illegally occupied Government lands in an extent of 96.61 sq. yards without valid title. Though the same was classified as ‘Kaluva Poramboku’ (water channel) within Tirupati Village. It was also stated that the petitioner did not obtain permission for construction of residential building and that the construction is made of asbestos sheets. Since the occupation and construction of the petitioner is illegal, the action against the petitioner has been contemplated. 3 4. In view of the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to put the petitioner on notice, call for explanation and then, take further action regarding the constructions made by the petitioner. Till such time, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 28.03.2025 PKR 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 301 WRIT PETITION NO: 7434 of 2025 Date: 28.03.2025 PKR