Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12310 (AP)

RAMASANI ANAND REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/3097/2025 · 2025-04-02

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

/r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND T\^/ENTY FIVE :PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3097OF2025 , REFT4,-1 Between : Ramasani Anand Reddy, S/o late Kona Reddy, Aged 60 years, Occ: Farmer, R/o 4-83, OC colony, Gunthapalli (V), Kanaganapalli (M) Sri Satya Sai ...Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by S H O Kanaganapalli P.S Through the PP Honourable High Court of AP at Amaravathi ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant bail in the Crime No.14/2025, dated 09.02.2025, on the file of SHO Kanaganapalli P.S for the alleged offences punishable U/s 109(1) r/w 3(5) BNS; ~ The petition coml'ng on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Gundala Siva Prasada Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and public Prosecutor for the Respondent; ~ APHCO10145342025 tl] +I+==E I. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3097 OF 2Q2± Between : Ramasani Anand Reddy The State of Andhra Pradesh AND [3369] .UPETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition, u/See.480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/accused, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.14/2025 of Kanaganapalli Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable u/See.109(1 ) r/w 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/state. EZil +i ------J\ I - _ _ 2 4. The brief facts of the Prosecution case are as follows: This is a case of Attempt to Murder that occurred on 09-02-2025 at around ll.30 am in front of Ramana's welding shop in Thogarakunta village of Kanaganapalli Mandal and reported in the P.S. on O9-02-2025 at 09 pm wherein the accused No.1-Chakali Narasimhulu, and Accused No.2-Anand Reddy had allegedly formed into a group with common intension to kill Vadla Chennappa, Narasimlulu allegedly armed wI'th an iron rod and attacked Chennappa on left side of his head and caused severe blood inJ'ury while, Anand Reddy attacked Chennappa with iron rod on his right leg and caused blood injury. In order to rescue himself, the said Chennappa, threw a sickle on Narasimhul which was caused blood injury to his right leg. The incident has been taken place Kaluding Jayaramu, Sreeramu and others who accompanied the spot intervened the issue and among the groups followed by the earlier political ill feelings. Observing the incident, the locals rescued Chennappa from the accused clutches while rushed him to Hitha Hospital, Ananthapuramu where he was rendered medical aide by the duty doctor. Basing on the written report of vadla chennappa, the s.I. of police, Kanaganapalli PS has registered a case and investigated into. 5. Heard. Perused the record. 6. Learned counsel forthe petitionersubmits thatthe petitionerhas been in judicial custody from ll.02.2025 and most of the investigation might have been completed and the statutory period of 60 days was completed and prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. €/ 3 7. Learned Public Prose¥'cutor submits that wound certificate is not yet received and there are some more witnesses to be examined. He further submits that the petitioner has no antecedents and the court may pass appropriate orders. 8. After careful observation of the material on record and submissions made on behalf of both sides, it shows that the petitioner has been in J'udiCial a` \ custody from ll.02.2025 and investigation is not completed. When ascertained, learned PublI'C Prosecutor submits that the injured in this case said-to be discharged from the hospital. considering the remand period of the petitI'Oner i.e., On ll.02.2025, this Court is of the view that by this time most of the investigation might have been completed with regard to the role played by the petitioner. This Court feels that release of the accused would not cause tampering of evidence and hampering of investigations and the Petitioner has got Permanent abode at Gunthapalli Village, Kanaganapalli Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District, as such there is no possibility of his fleeing away from justice. ln the said facts of the case, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 9. ln the result, the criminal petI'tiOn iS allowed With the following conditions: (i) The petitioner/accused herein shall be released on his executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judge Family Court-Gum-Vll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapuram District; {35ffZE71jiE@ E= I ` I 4 (ii) on release, the petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and o1.00 p.m., for a period of three (03) months. (iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence and hamper the investigation and sha[[ cooperate for investigation. sD/- K. KASIRAO ACHARl ASSISTANT STRAR //TRUE COPYJ SECTION OF ___\|\-n To, 1. The Family Court-Gum-Vll Addl District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapuram. 2. The Superintendent, Ananthapuram District Jail. 3. The Station House Officer, Kanaganapalli Police Station .4. One,CC to Sri. Gundala Siva Prasada Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two cos to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT] 6. One spare copy MM \- _-.. HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED :02/04/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.3097 of 2025 ALLOWED » i,if4®Sffi.£ft*- ¥ l®& ELPR lllLb ~ca# u a r\\\\ uLes:=; a L\ i,:#i..-,