T.Shanmuga Chidambara Vadivu @ Raji v. The Principal Accountant General A and E Tamilnadu
WP(MD)/4671/2025 · 2025-03-12
Battu Devanand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123083 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123083 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(MD)No.4671 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.4671 of 2025
T.Shanmuga Chidambara Vadivu @ Raji ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Principal Accountant General A & E Tamilnadu, No.361, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, Madurai – 625 001. 3.The Assistant Treasury Officer, Sub Treasury, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053 ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2024 and sanction and pay the full family pension to the petitioner through the third respondent within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Dharani For R2 & R3 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader For R1 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.4671 of 2025 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2024 and sanction and pay the full family pension to her through the third respondent within a stipulated time. 2. During the course of hearing, Mr.Gunassekaran, learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, would submit that the request of the petitioner for payment of 100% full family pension was rejected. He would further submit that the petitioner is eligible to continue to pay 50% of the family pension, which is already she is getting. The learned Standing Counsel also placed a copy of the proceedings dated 25.02.2025, wherein the request of the petitioner was rejected stating the reasons. The said copy is placed on record. 3. In view of the fact that the request of the petitioner has been rejected by the first respondent vide proceedings dated 25.02.2025, in my considered view, no further order is required in the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the proceedings dated 25.02.2025 issued by 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.4671 of 2025 the first respondent before the appropriate forum, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. 12.03.2025 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no CM To:
1. The Principal Accountant General A & E Tamilnadu, No.361, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, Madurai – 625 001.
3.The Assistant Treasury Officer, Sub Treasury, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.4671 of 2025 BATTU DEVANAND
, J.
CM W.P.(MD)No.4671 of 2025 12.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis