Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12307 (ALL)

BABY KATARIYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/1092/2025 · 2025-02-12

Ajit Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21160 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1092 of 2025 Petitioner :- Baby Katariya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kulveer Singh,Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Learned learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No.- 2 to consider her claim for transfer from Lucknow to Pilibhit or any other adjacent district to Pilibhit as her husband resides there and is also working on the post of constable and the couple have four month old child. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection in the event application seeking request for transfer is directed to be disposed of in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make fresh representation detailing all her grievances therein annexing therewith the relevant medical report for her request of transfer from Lucknow to Pilibhit or any other adjacent place within a period of two weeks from today before the authority concerned, the same shall be considered and disposed of within a maximum period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is further provided that while considering the request of transfer the respondent shall take pragmatic view as she has four month child and her husband is already posted at Pilibhit as constable. Needless to add, the order to be passed by the authority concerned, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Atmesh Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad