MAHMOOD RIAZ S/O ABDUL AZIZ v. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR,
SWP/597/2018 · 2025-09-25
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12302 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12302 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 33
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 597/2018
Mahmood Riaz
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
State of J&K
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None. .
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
25.09.2025
1. On the previous date of hearing, the counsel for the petitioner sought time to obtain instructions. However, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present today, nor have any instructions been reported on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner has lost interest to prosecute the instant writ petition.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul)
Judge
Jammu: 25.09.2025 Javid Iqbal