UNION OF INDIA TH. SECRETARY TO GOVT.,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE v. SUKHWINDER SINGH
WP(C)/2491/2024 · 2025-09-24
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12296 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12296 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2491/2024
UOI
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, Advocate
vs
Sukhwinder Singh .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Chakshu Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 24.09.2025
1. In this petition, the petitioners have called in question the order and
judgment dated 07.04.2022, passed by Armed Forces Tribunal, Srinagar Bench, at Jammu [“the Tribunal”] in O.A. No. 216/2019 titled No. 13698431X Ex. Rect Sukhwinder Singh Vs. UOI & Ors. whereby the Tribunal has allowed the OA of the respondent and held him entitled to the disability pension by placing his disability as 20% with effect from 25.06.2014 and has restricted the arrears to three years preceding the date of institution of the O.A.
2. The matter involved in this petition is fully covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sukhvinder Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors., Civil Appeal No 5605 of 2010 decided on
25.06.2014. Serial No. 46
2 WP(C) No. 2491/2024
3. The issue raised in this petition is, therefore, no longer res integra and there is no ground made out for admission of this petition. Hence, being devoid of merit, this petition is dismissed.
(Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar)
Judge
Judge
Jammu 24.09.2025 Vishal Sharma