Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12294 (UTT)

BHUPESH PUNETHA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2267/2021 · 2025-07-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2267 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Geetanjali Dhami, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Amit Kapri, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the parties are unanimous on the point that after investigation a charge sheet dated 08.03.2025 has been filed against the petitioners. 4. To prove this fact, learned State counsel has passed on written instructions to this Court, which are taken on record. 5. In view of the statement made by counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioners to challenge the said charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.07.2025 SK