Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12289 (CHH)

MANKURAM PADDA v. ARVIND @ TINKU VISWAS

MAC/647/2019 · 2025-08-04

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:38919 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 647 of 2019 1. Mankuram Padda S/o Late Bakkeram Padda Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Nayapara, Savera, Polie Station Bande, Tahsil Pakhanjur, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker...........(Claimant) ... Appellant versus 1. Arvind @ Tinku Viswas S/o Amr Viswas Aged About 20 Years R/o P.V. 87, Jaydevpur, P.S. Bande, Tahsil Pakhanjur, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker, District- Kanker (CG)...........(Driver), 2. Nikhil Mandal S/o Panchu Mandalm Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Dempara, Bande, Tahsil Pakhanjur, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgah.......(Owner) 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgah...........(Insurer).........(Non-Applicants) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 5/8/2025 1. Today, when the matter is called out for hearing in first round, none appeared on behalf of appellant. Even in second round there is no representation. Earlier on 23.7.2025 also when the SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI 2 matter was taken up for hearing twice, none appeared on behalf of appellant in both calls. 2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-