Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 122884 (ALL)

AMRINDAR MUTTI @ AMRINDRA SINGH @ NIKKA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/216/2025 · 2025-02-17

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10124 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 216 of 2025 Applicant :- Amrindar Mutti @ Amrindra Singh @ Nikka Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.673 of 2018, under Sections 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station Nighasan, District Lakhimpur Kheri. From perusal of the F.I.R. as well as the record, it transpires that the applicant is found involved in committing cheat and fraud and further there is a case criminal history against the applicant that too with respect to committing fraud, thus, the matter pertains to financial fraud. This Court is also aware of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, reported in (2019)9 Supreme Court Cases, 24, wherein it has been held that case of economic offences are of different class as they affect the economic fabric of the society and therefore, the power under section 438 of the Cr.P.C., be exercised sparingly and in such matters, the bail applications must be granted in exceptional cases, after application of mind in relation to nature and gravity of accusation, possibility of applicant fleeing justice and other factors. Learned counsel for the applicant has failed to satisfactorily substantiate that the applicant would not tamper the evidences and would not threaten the witnesses. Apprehension of arrest has also been denied. Considering the complicity of the accused and the gravity of offence, this Court do not find any good ground to intervene in this matter. Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed. Consigned to records. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Ram Murti Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench