HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- WP(C) No. 2540/2024 Khem Raj .....Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate Vs Chief Engineer PWD (R&B) Batote and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R- 1 to 3 & 5 Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG for R- 4 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 26.09.2025 01. Heard. 02. Admit. 03. The only grievance which has been projected by Mr. Ashok Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner that he would feel satisfied that in case, the instant petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to accord due consideration to the representations alleged to have been filed by the petitioner dated 20.04.2024 followed by the latest representation filed on 15.07.2024. 04. The learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to the disposal of the instant writ petition, in case, a direction is given to the respondents to decide the said representations within some reasonable period strictly under rules as per law. S. No. 20 2 05. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal and this Court deems it proper to dispose of the instant petition by directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 5 to decide the representations alleged to have been filed on 20.04.2024 and followed by the latest one on 15.07.2024 within a period of four weeks from the date order a copy of this order passed by this Court along with the writ petition and annexures are made available to the said respondents by the petitioner. 06. The writ petition is disposed of. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 26.09.2025 Riya Kochhar