Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010100222024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2671/2024 SAHJAHAN ALI @ SAHJEHAN ALI SON OF ABDUL HAMID, RESIDENT OF PASCHIM KHATAR KALAKUCHI, POLICE STATION- KALAKUCHI, MUKALMUA, DISTRICT- NALBARI, PIN- 781310, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. 2:THE SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN- 781006 DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN- 781006 DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM. 4:THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 781022. 5:THE SECRETARY ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 781022. 6:THE PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 781022. 7:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 781022. 8:THE STATE COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY STATE COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM. 9:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCAITON (TECH.) KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 781019 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K MUNIR, MR A RAHMAN,MR. A. GAYAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, APSC,SC, TECHNICAL EDU. Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 16-06-2025 Heard Mr. A. Gayan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner who submits that instructions as directed by this Court vide order dated 30-05-2025, have still not been produced by the respondents counsel. However, today when the matter is called up, Mr. T.J. Mahanta, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Ms. P. Sarma, learned standing counsel, APSC appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 to 7 submits that the selection process in question, was initiated way back in the year 2022 and the same has not only been concluded long back but the process of appointment of the selected candidates is also over. Under such circumstances, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition, at this stage. Responding to the above submission, Mr. Gayan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy as may be available to his client. Prayer is allowed. Writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. Ms. A. Talukdar, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Mr. S. Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 8 and 9 are present. Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE Comparing Assistant