MOHD. ANAS ANSARI v. THE COURT OF LEARNED SPECIAL ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CBI(A.P.) LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/122/2025 · 2025-02-11
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122841 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122841 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8867 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 122 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohd. Anas Ansari Opposite Party :- The Court Of Learned Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Cbi(A.P.) Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Suchita Tripathi,Balram Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to respondent No. 2 is dispensed with.
3. By this petition the petitioner has prayed to expeditious disposal of compliant case No. 90644 of 2022, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.: Mohd Anas Ansari Vs. Smt. Veena Singh, pending in the Court of Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I. (A.P.),Lucknow.
4. Perused the record and gone through the order sheet.
5. Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others Vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 30839/2021, has held that undue preference should not be given to the new trials while expediting the proceedings over the old trial. This is a new trial much older trials are pending.
6. Thus considering the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court M. Gopalakrishnan and others (supra) and the facts of the case, the prayer for expeditious disposal is refused.
7. The petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 11.2.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench