Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 122836 (ALL)

S.R.D. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD THRU. PRESIDENT DINESH CHANDRA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., HIGHER EDUCATION, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/1361/2025 · 2025-02-12

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8887 Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1361 of 2025 Petitioner :- S.R.D. College, Firozabad Thru. President Dinesh Chandra And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Higher Education, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopal Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anagh Misra,Rajesh Tewari Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 3, Mr. Anagh Misra, learned counsel for opposite party no.4 while notice on behalf of opposite party no.5 has been accepted by Rajesh Tiwari, Advocate. 2. Petition has been filed challenging notice dated 10.12.2024 fixing time-frame of 31.12.2024 for uploading the Performance Appraisal Report by all the institutions concerned on the portal of National Council for Teacher Education. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner does not wish to press his challenge to notice dated 10.12.2024 and submits that twice earlier, the last date for submission of Performance Appraisal Report has already been extended by the Council but the Performance Appraisal Report could not be uploaded by the institution due to technical glitches . 4. Learned counsel for petitioner at present restricts his prayer for a decision on representation by authority concerned. 5. Learned counsel for opposite party no.4 on the basis of instructions however submits that time limit for uploading the Performance Appraisal Report has already been extended twice, which was not availed of by petitioner-institution and as of now there is no proposal for any further extension as indicated in the notice dated 10.12.2024. 6. In view of submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner however liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party no.4, i.e. Regional Director, National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi who may consider and decide the same expeditiously. Petitioner shall annex a copy of this order along with fresh representation before the authority concerned. 7. With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 12.2.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench