SEEMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADLL. CHIEF SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/1751/2025 · 2025-02-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8954 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1751 of 2025 Petitioner :- Seema Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Adll. Chief Secy. Medical And Health Services Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.R. Dev,Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Puneet Chandra Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri R. R. Dev, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State- respondents and Sri Mohit Chandra holding brief of Sri Puneet Chandra for respondent No.2.
2. It has been submitted that the petitioner was working as Staff Nurse at Community Health Centre, Bilgram, District Hardoi where a first information report was registered against her in case crime No.499/2024 under Sections- 304 A, 504 of IPC, under Sections 3(2) (va), 3(1) (s) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In pursuance of the said first information report the petitioner was taken into custody on 7.12.2024 and was released on bail on
10.1.2025. After being released on bail the petitioner moved an application to opposite party No.s 4 and 5 for permitting her to join her services but no direction has been issued and consequently the petitioner has confined her prayer for a suitable direction to opposite party No.s 4 and 5 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner for permitting him to join her services.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties do not object to the prayer made by the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the petition is being disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to opposite party No.4 within ten days from today.
5. In case, such a representation is made opposite party No.4 shall pass appropriate orders thereon with expedition, preferably within three weeks from the date of its receipt by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 12.2.2025/RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench