Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12283 (UTT)

ASHISH NEGI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1119/2024 · 2025-03-25

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1119 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Nalin Saun, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Rohit Kumar, learned counsel put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.3 and seeks permission to file his vakalatnama during the course of the day. 4. The permission, so made, is granted. 5. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned for the reasons stated in the affidavit. Delay condonation application (IA No.2/2025) thus stands disposed of. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 6. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 12.10.2024. 7. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby closed. 8. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate Forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.03.2025 AK